Medical Malpractice Overview


Medical malpractice occurs when a person suffers injury due to the negligent act or omission of a health care provider. Common categories of medical malpractice cases include the failure by a health care provider to follow standard procedures, properly diagnose a medical condition (for example, failure to diagnose cancer), and to prevent injury at birth. When a lawsuit alleges negligent injury causing death, it is a "wrongful death" case.

To be successful in a medical malpractice lawsuit, the plaintiff, who is either the injured person or the injured person's legal representative in a wrongful death case, must prove by a preponderance of the evidence (meaning, more likely than not) that the health care provider breached a duty owed to the plaintiff, causing injury and damages to plaintiff. Specifically, the plaintiff must show:
. the health care provider owed plaintiff a duty (which arises when plaintiff enlists care, services, or treatment from a health care provider)
. the health care provider breached the duty owed to plaintiff by failing to provide care, services, or treatment commensurate with the standard of care practiced within the relevant medical community, and
. this failure caused injury and damages to the plaintiff.

Who can be liable for medical malpractice?

A plaintiff may bring a case against a health care provider, such as a doctor, dentist, or nurse. The employer of the health care provider, such as a hospital, may also be sued under the theory of respondeat superior (meaning, "let the master answer"). This theory, which provides for vicarious liability of the health care provider's employer, may be used where the negligent health care provider was, at the relevant time, an employee acting within the scope of employment. Where the health care provider is an independent contractor (not an employee), vicarious liability may still attach, for example, if the plaintiff can show the entity's negligent hiring of the independent contractor proximately caused plaintiff's injury.

What damages are available in a medical malpractice lawsuit?

Successful plaintiffs in medical malpractice may recover "compensatory" damages. Such damages are monetary compensation for the pain and suffering (physical and psychological) caused by the injury, and for financial losses, including medical bills, lost wages, and loss of earning power, if any, caused by the harm. A plaintiff may also be awarded "punitive" damages, which are aimed at punishing and deterring a defendant for wanton or reckless conduct.

What law governs medical malpractice cases?

As part of tort law, medical malpractice derives from the common law (or judge-made law). In addition, states have enacted tort legislation, including law on medical malpractice.

Many states have legislated medical malpractice reforms in response to claims by health care providers that lawsuit costs have driven up medical costs and medical malpractice insurance premiums, despite studies challenging the accuracy of these claims. One widely adopted reform is the setting of a limit (known as a "cap") on monetary damages recoverable in medical malpractice lawsuits, regardless of the actual amount of loss suffered by the plaintiff in an individual case. Additionally, some states require a plaintiff to submit, as a prerequisite to filing a lawsuit, an affidavit (a sworn written statement) by a health care practitioner in the same field as the alleged wrongdoer that a reasonable likelihood of a deviation from the relevant medical standard of care occurred.

Although some federal laws apply to medical malpractice cases, such as Constitutional limits on the award of damages, the federal government has not enacted any overarching substantive federal law on medical malpractice.

Medical Malpractice Law


Medical malpractice occurs where a medical practitioner acts in a negligent manner when treating a medical condition. Malpractice can occur from an action taken by the medical practitioner, or by the failure to take a medically appropriate action. Examples of medical malpractice include:
. Failure to diagnose, or misdiagnosis of a disease or medical condition;
. Failure to provide appropriate treatment for a medical condition;
. Unreasonable delay in treating a diagnosed medical condition;

The laws and rules governing malpractice lawsuits in each state can vary significantly.
Informed Consent

A medical practitioner may also be legally liable if a patient does not give "informed consent" to a medical procedure that results in a harm to the patient, even if the procedure is performed properly.
For example, if a doctor does not tell a patient that a surgical procedure has a 50% chance of causing paralysis, the patient does not have the necessary information to make an informed choice to either have or refuse the operation.

If the patient has the operation, and is paralyzed as a result, the doctor may be liable even if the operation was performed flawlessly, as the patient might have refused the surgery if the risks were known.

Medical Error Without Harm

If the patient is not harmed by the physician's error, the patient cannot recover damages as the result of the error. For example, if a doctor misdiagnoses stomach pain as caused by appendicitis, and surgery discloses that it resulted from a perforated ulcer, if the patient would have required the surgery to repair the ulcer the patient will probably be unable to bring a lawsuit - the surgery was necessary even with the correct diagnosis. However, if the patient was only suffering from indigestion, the unnecessary surgical procedure most likely would support a malpractice action.

The Impact of "Tort Reform"

Medical malpractice actions have been significantly affected by "tort reform." Malpractice cases are very expensive to litigate, and your recovery of damages may be limited by statute. It is necessary to seek advice from medical experts, who can be very costly to hire. Due to the highly technical nature of medical malpractice litigation, it is usually best to go to an attorney who specializes in medical malpractice law, and who has the resources necessary to develop your case, hire appropriate experts and, if necessary, to take your case to trial.

The High Cost of Malpractice Litigation
Sometimes, even when there is a clear case of medical negligence, a suit may not be appropriate. Due to the high costs of litigating medical malpractice cases, some injured people will find that the cost of litigation will exceed the amount of any damages award, and they are forced to choose between abandoning their claim or pursuing it at a financial loss "as a matter of principle."
Finding A Good Lawyer

Medical malpractice law is a highly technical, specialized field. You will find that some medical malpractice attorneys primarily handle birth trauma cases, while others handle surgical errors, and others handle misdiagnosis of cancer, or some other narrow area of medical negligence. If your case is very technical, you should seek an appropriately specialized lawyer.

When you are consulting malpractice attorneys, it is helpful if you can provide them with copies any documents or records that you have, relating to your case. Before hiring a malpractice lawyer, you may wish to read our article on how to hire a personal injury attorney. You may also wish to ask the following questions:
. How much experience do you have with medical malpractice cases?
. How much experience do you have with cases like mine?
. How do keep yourself educated about current medical issues?
. Do you have the financial resources to take my case to trial, if necessary?
. How many medical malpractice cases have you taken to trial?
. How do you find medical experts for your malpractice cases?

Most medical malpractice attorneys take their cases on a "contingency" basis, where the attorney fee is a percentage of the amount recovered from the defendant through judgment or settlement (usually 1/3 of the judgment, after costs and fees are deducted). It is unusual for attorneys to take malpractice cases on a "retained" basis, where the client pays the attorney fees and costs but receives the entire judgment or settlement, as few clients can afford that option. In many malpractice cases, by the time a case reaches trial, costs alone can exceed $100,000.00.

Medical malpractice cases are expensive and difficult, and attorneys choose their battles very carefully. Don't feel hurt if an attorney refuses your case, and don't be bashful about requesting a referral to another attorney for a "second opinion."

You may find that an attorney's initial acceptance of your case is conditioned upon a thorough investigation and review of the medical records. You will need to provide your attorney with the names of all physicians who have treated you, so that all of your medical records can be reviewed. It is important that you tell your attorney about all of your doctors and medical conditions, even if you think they don't have anything to do with your case.

A Long, Difficult Process

When you initiate medical malpractice litigation, you should be aware that it can be a very long, difficult process. You may find yourself answering very personal questions, including in response to "interrogatories" (written questions) and at "depositions" (live testimony, taken under oath, often at an attorney's office), and spending a surprising amount of time assisting your attorney with your case. While some cases are resolved quickly, it may be months or years before your case is resolved.

Mesothelioma Lawyers


Mesothelioma Legal Aspects

The first lawsuits against asbestos manufacturers were in 1929. Since then, many lawsuits have been filed against asbestos manufacturers and employers, for neglecting to implement safety measures after the links between asbestos, asbestosis, and mesothelioma became known (some reports seem to place this as early as 1898). The liability resulting from the sheer number of lawsuits and people affected has reached billions of dollars. The amounts and method of allocating compensation have been the source of many court cases, and government attempts at resolution of existing and future cases.

The first lawsuit against asbestos manufacturers was brought in 1929. The parties settled that lawsuit, and as part of the agreement, the attorneys agreed not to pursue further cases. It was not until 1960 that an article published by Wagner et al first officially established mesothelioma as a disease arising from exposure to crocidolite asbestos. The article referred to over 30 case studies of people who had suffered from mesothelioma in South Africa. Some exposures were transient and some were mine workers. In 1962 McNulty reported the first diagnosed case of malignant mesothelioma in an Australian asbestos worker. The worker had worked in the mill at the asbestos mine in Wittenoom from 1948 to 1950.

In the town of Wittenoom, asbestos-containing mine waste was used to cover schoolyards and playgrounds. In 1965 an article in the British Journal of Industrial Medicine established that people who lived in the neighbourhoods of asbestos factories and mines, but did not work in them, had contracted mesothelioma.

Despite proof that the dust associated with asbestos mining and milling causes asbestos related disease, mining began at Wittenoom in 1943 and continued until 1966. In 1974 the first public warnings of the dangers of blue asbestos were published in a cover story called "Is this Killer in Your Home?"

In 1978 the Western Australian Government decided to phase out the town of Wittenoom, following the publication of a Health Dept. booklet, "The Health Hazard at Wittenoom", containing the results of air sampling and an appraisal of worldwide medical information.

By 1979 the first writs for negligence related to Wittenoom were issued against CSR and its subsidiary ABA, and the Asbestos Diseases Society was formed to represent the Wittenoom victims.

There is currently no cure for mesothelioma, but victims of this terrible disease still have many options available for support. In addition to support from family & friends, it is also important to get legal support. Mesothelioma victims have many legal options to explore and it is very important that you contact a qualified mesothelioma lawyer as soon as possible.

A good Mesothelioma Lawyer understands the unique complexities involved in this kind of litigation lawsuit, including asbestos product identification, specific asbestos-related medical issues, and specific time constraints that narrow the window of opportunity to file a claim. It's important to find the right Mesothelioma lawyer.